Florida Executive Realty Divots for the Deaf

Divots_For_The_Deaf

Please join us for the Florida Executive Realty Divots for the Deaf 2015 Charity Golf Tournament to benefit Hillsborough and Pinellas Countys’ Deaf and Hard of Hearing Community!

When: May 18, 2015 Lunch & fun starts at 11:30am, tee off is at 1:00pm. 

Where: Westchase Golf Course

CLICK HERE TO JOIN THE FUN, SIGN UP, AND HELP THOSE WITH HEARING LOSS!

CLICK HERE to download a PDF that delineates the sponsorship costs and benefits and more information about the day’s events.

100% of the proceeds will be donated to three Deaf non-profit 501c3 agencies:
Blossom Montessori School for the Deaf (Children)
Communication Access (Closed caption and American Sign Language)
• Association for Late Deafened Adults
• National Association of the Deaf 

Did you know? The Tampa Bay area is the third largest in the USA with over 400,000 Deaf and Hard of Hearing individuals? One of our agent’s wife, Cindy, had profound hearing loss in her 30′s and became totally deaf. She decided to have Cochlear Implant surgery and it has helped her hear again. The struggle to be in a hearing world is challenging. We take many things for granted when it comes to hearing, but the reality is that movie theaters, museums, amusement parks, grocery stores, public agencies, and other businesses rarely have accommodations such as closed captioning for those with hearing loss. As our population grows older and suffers from hearing loss (like Cindy and those that have been living with this disability for their entire life or recently) we need to make changes.

Help us support these wonderful organizations. I encourage you to go to each of their websites to see what wonderful things they are doing.

Upscale SkyHouse Tower on the Rise in Downtown Tampa

Construction project manager Carl Giovenco carefully walks atop a freshly laid concrete pad that forms the top, 23rd floor of the SkyHouse tower as welders and steelworkers form a frenzy of buzzing and pounding all around — seemingly immune to the knee-wobbling heights.

Looking into what will be an immense swimming pool on this rooftop deck, Giovenco muses aloud, “This actually will end up being the highest swimming pool in all of Tampa Bay. Not a bad view when you’re swimming.” Below — well below — are The Florida Aquarium, Amalie Arena and much of downtown Tampa, and off in the distance are sights such as Raymond James Stadium, Davis Islands and Tampa Bay.

“SkyHouse” is not just a brand name. Rather than rent the top floors to just one resident, the whole SkyHouse tower is named for an immense penthouse apartment at the top that any of the tower’s residents may use, essentially as an extension of their living rooms and as a sky-high version of the courtyard clubhouses in mere four- or five-story apartment complexes.

Soon, residents of this Channel District tower at 112 N. 12th St. will be able to splash in the pool while sipping a cocktail, lounge about watching gigantic flat-screen TVs or cool off in a living room with pool table, arcade and gigantic TV. There’s even an artificial turf “lawn” where residents can lounge on Adirondack chairs with a beverage.

Today, top executives of the development team will hold a “topping out” ceremony, a traditional milestone in a tower’s construction when workers reach the highest point of a planned structure. As is traditional in the construction community, they will attach a pine tree atop for good luck, and probably a giant American flag and flag of Batson-Cook, the construction company in charge, and one for Novare Group, the overall developer behind similar SkyHouse towers across the country.

SkyHouse will have plenty of competition in Tampa because of a series of towers sprouting up downtown, putting each tower in a head-to-head competition for high-earning millennial renters who have come to expect over-the-top luxuries: posh yoga studios, cocktail lounges, wine lockers and blistering-fast Internet speeds.

Many apartment towers are in the planning phase, and developers are sifting out which will have the most posh perks:

The Residences at the Riverwalk may boast the highest height, at 36-stories, with 380 units planned adjacent to the Straz Center along the Hillsborough River. After dismissal of lawsuits seeking to block the project, the tower is well into the planning phase, and Tampa expects to begin rerouting some streets to straighten out the now-twisted routes around the Straz and make way for a promenade of shops and restaurants.

That tower is backed by Greg Minder of Intown Group and Phillip Smith of Framework Group, who also are planning for a new tower on Harbour Island called — for now — the Harbour Island Apartments. That 21-story tower at the northeast corner of Knights Run Avenue and Harbour Post Drive could see completion in 2016. It will have 235 units, including several two-story units near the base. Compared with other residential towers in the area that focus on studio and one-bedroom apartments, this site is characterized by developers as more of a luxury living complex with hotel-like services.

Nearby, South Florida-based Related Group plans to build a 21-story, 340-unit tower at 402 Knights Run Ave. with a parking garage across the street.

The Martin at Meridian in the Channel District will be a 24-story tower with 316 units. That project has been proposed in several forms during the peaks and valleys of the housing market and is a frequent target of speculation for a downtown grocery store.

Atlanta-based Carter & Associates plans a yet-unnamed tower that will take up an entire block in the core of downtown, bordered by Florida Avenue, Cass Street, Franklin Street and Tyler Street. That project could include 375 units in an L-shaped 23-story tower. If all goes according to plan, that tower could break ground in the beginning of 2015.

Sugar producer Florida Crystals Corp. this summer bought a Channel District property for $3.8 million and plans to build 270 luxury apartments on the former Amazon Hose & Rubber Co. site at 222 N. 12th St.

Tampa Bay Lightning owner Jeff Vinik plans to put a hotel-resident combination tower at Florida Avenue and Old Water Street. Though largely a hotel, that property may include 50 luxury residences. If built like other hotel-apartment projects nationwide by Ritz-Carlton and Hyatt, the property would offer residents the concierge and gourmet room service of a five-star hotel.

Though not technically a tower, the new Crescent Bayshore apartment complex at Bayshore Boulevard and Beach Place significantly ramped up the luxury level of apartments near downtown when it formally opened this year with a two-story fitness center, a yoga studio overlooking the bay, a business lounge and a Resident Club Room with wine bottle lockers.

Tampa towers have competition from new condos and apartments across the bay as well.

The 18-story Bliss condo project, planned to overlook Beach Drive from Fourth Avenue in St. Petersburg, will feature floor-to-ceiling windows in all bedrooms to take in views of Tampa Bay, with private elevator foyers and car lifts to whisk residents to their parking spaces on the first few floors.

The Salvador, a 13-story tower at Second Street South and Dalí Boulevard in St. Petersburg, will offer a concierge staff five days a week, a third-floor deck with a spa and heated saltwater pool, and gas cooktops in all 74 condo homes.

Just outside downtown St. Petersburg, the Water Club at Snell Isle gives residents direct access to the water, with boat slips and plenty of space to entertain guests at a waterside cabana, resort swimming pool and whirlpool spa.

Many of the rental apartment complexes going up in the city also offer amenities like the 3,000-square-foot fitness center at Beacon 430, at 430 3rd Ave. S., that will be open 24 hours a day with in-house exercise classes.

❖ ❖ ❖

As for who will live in all these new towers, developers of each project are targeting a similar set of demographics: millennials primarily, but also suburbanites who are moving downtown for entertainment options and empty-nesters who no longer wish to keep up with the maintenance of a full-size house and yard.

“Tampa is the main business center along the west coast of Florida and continues to draw young, educated professionals,” said Jim Borders, president and chief executive of Novare Group, which is building SkyHouse. Borders points to statistics that show that since 2008, the number of people between the ages of 18 and 34 has steadily increased across the country, and “a majority of this generation wants to live in a walkable urban setting close to public transportation.”

He picked the Channel District, he said, because it will “capture a large portion of the growth that is expected in Tampa.”

Studio apartments at SkyHouse will start around $1,200 a month, with one-bedrooom units at $1,300, two bedrooms for $1,900 and three bedrooms for $2,400. As for what will draw all those millenials to pay those prices at SkyHouse versus other towers, Borders pointed to the top floor and its communal wraparound penthouse that “allows all residents to have access to the best views in the city.”

The tower boom isn’t likely to slow down anytime soon, said Sean Williams, a commercial real estate broker with CBRE who specializes in apartment properties. To compete, their amenities likely will grow more posh. He’s seeing towers go up with full-time concierge services, multiple lounges and cafes, business conference rooms for work-at-home entrepreneurs, virtual golf simulators and even small bowling alleys.

The particularly high level of rents the Crescent project drew only helped give investors more confidence in financing new towers.

Meanwhile, homeownership rates continue to fall as more people choose to rent. “You have the young professionals moving downtown and the empty-nesters who don’t want to take care of the house anymore,” Williams said. “You’re even seeing some parents and children competing for the same rental space.”

 For pictures and original story, click here

By Richard Mullins | Tribune Staff
Published: October 30, 2014   |   Updated: October 30, 2014 at 07:07 AM

rmullins@tampatrib.com

(813) 259-7919

Twitter: @DailyDeadline

 

Staff writer Joshua Boatwright contributed to this report.

New Outlet Mall in Wesley Chapel!

Retail behemoth Simon Property Group has confirmed that construction on Tampa Premium Outlets is under way and said that the property is slated to open in October 2015.
Indianapolis-based Simon said in its third-quarter earnings report Wednesday that construction began on the 441,000-square-foot project in the third quarter. Simon paid $14.6 million for the site in early October, according to Pasco County property records. Pasco planning officials approved Simon’s construction plans shortly before the sale closed.
The mall will be located at the intersection of Interstate 75 and State Road 56 in Wesley Chapel. Click here to see Simon’s leasing flyer.
A Simon spokesman declined comment on the outlet mall beyond the information in the release. It’s not clear if the previously announced anchor, Saks Off Fifth, is still committed to the deal, though it’s unlikely Simon would close on the land without a deal with an anchor tenant in place.
The Tampa Premium Outlets are part of $2.2 billion pipeline of Simon developments, the company said, a number of which are outlet malls, located throughout the country. More retailers are embracing their outlet concepts, putting outlet stores closer to their mainline locations.

 

Ashley Gurbal Kritzer is a reporter for the Tampa Bay Business Journal.

NAR to Congress: Extend Short Sale Forgiveness

WASHINGTON – Aug. 22, 2014 – The National Association of Realtors® (NAR) issued a statement backing earlier comments by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder.

Holder first announced a $7 billion settlement with Bank of America, but he followed up the announcement with a call for Congress to “do the right thing for financially distressed American families who lost homes to foreclosure or short sales this year.”

“Realtors agree,” said NAR President Steve Brown in a statement following Holder’s announcement.

On Dec. 31, 2014, tax forgiveness for short sales and foreclosures ended. Under tax relief, a bank forgives part of a debt – usually the difference between the home’s selling price and the amount remaining on the mortgage – and the forgiven money isn’t considered income for tax purposes.

Effective Jan. 1, however, that money is no longer shielded from taxation. Without Congress authorizing an extension and making it retroactive to Jan. 1, distressed sellers who had part of their mortgage debt forgiven must consider the forgiven amount as income – but income they never received. As a result, the IRS would expect them to pay taxes on that amount in 2015 when they fill out this year’s taxes.

Holder tied the issue to the just-announced settlement with Bank of America, lamenting that Congressional inaction to extend the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act means that the people helped by the settlement funds will instead be penalized on their income taxes.

“The tax relief expired on December 31 last year and unless Congress acts to extend it, every person who has already sold or plans to sell a home in a short sale in 2014, will pay taxes on nonexistent mortgage debt, which is money many don’t have,” said Brown.

“Realtors are strong supporters of the bipartisan Mortgage Forgiveness Tax Relief Act … to prevent underwater borrowers from paying taxes on any mortgage debt forgiven or cancelled by a lender after their home is sold for less money than is owed,” said Brown. “Taxing forgiven mortgage debt as income is an unfair practice that also incentivizes defaults and foreclosures, which could torpedo the housing recovery. Congress should take immediate action to pass this legislation.”

© 2014 Florida Realtors®

Florida to get $1B from Bank of America settlement

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – Aug. 22, 2014 – Nearly 17,000 Floridians will receive more than $1 billion in relief as part of a record-setting national settlement with Bank of America, the Florida Attorney General’s Office announced Thursday.

Bank of America Corp. agreed to pay $16.65 billion to end federal, Florida and other state investigations into the sale of toxic mortgage securities during the subprime housing boom. The settlement includes $9.65 billion in fines and $7 billion in aid to communities and homeowners hit hard by the housing market crash that triggered the Great Recession.

“This historic resolution – the largest such settlement on record – goes far beyond ‘the cost of doing business,'” Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said in describing what he called “pervasive schemes to defraud financial institutions and other investors.”

Details are still being worked out on who in Florida will receive the aid and how much, said Attorney General spokesman Whitney Ray. “Programs are being set up to inform eligible borrowers,” he said.

The consumer relief will include principal reduction and forgiveness, loan modifications and new loans to credit-worthy borrowers struggling to get a loan, Ray said. There also will be financing for affordable rental housing and donations given to help communities still recovering from the financial crisis, he added.

Overall, Florida will receive about a seventh of the settlement’s $7 billion in aid to communities and homeowners hit hard by the housing market crash, estimated Jana J. Litsey, Bank of America deputy general counsel, in a letter to Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Most of the toxic loans that backed the securities came from firms BofA acquired in 2008, including Countrywide Financial Corp. of Calabasas and Wall Street investment bank Merrill Lynch & Co.

BofA already had incurred about $60 billion in losses and legal settlements from the purchase of Countrywide, which was one of the nation’s biggest subprime mortgage lenders during the housing boom of the mid 2000s.

AP Logo  Copyright © 2014 the Sun Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.), Donna Gehrke-White. Distributed by MCT Information Services.

Watch Out for Foreclosure Scams!

WASHINGTON – July 24, 2014 – The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and 15 states, including Florida, announced a sweep against foreclosure relief scammers that used deceptive marketing tactics to rip off distressed owners.

CFPB says it’s filing three lawsuits against companies and individuals that collected more than $25 million in illegal advance fees for services that falsely promised to prevent foreclosures or renegotiate troubled mortgages. The CFPB is seeking compensation for victims, civil fines and injunctions against the scammers.

Separately, the FTC is filing 6 lawsuits, and the states are taking 32 actions.

In Florida, Attorney General Pam Bondi and CFPB obtained an emergency temporary restraining order and appointment of a receiver in a joint lawsuit filed against Florida-based Hoffman Law Group (HLG) and related entities. The order prohibits HLG defendants from doing business with consumers and freezes HLG’s bank accounts.

Based in North Palm Beach, HLG and its affiliates allegedly received millions of dollars from distressed homeowners across the country, typically charging $6,000 per homeowner to sign up along with additional monthly payments of $500. HLG promised homeowners financial relief in the form of mortgage debt forgiveness, loan modifications and other foreclosure-related relief, and cash payments through participation in mass-joinder lawsuits that HLG was filing against numerous mortgage lenders across the country.

The lawsuit against HLG claims it violated the federal Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Rule (MARS) and state laws by collecting upfront fees before obtaining a loan modification, misrepresenting to consumers the services and relief they would receive, failing to make disclosures required by law, and other violations.

“Florida’s distressed homeowners should not have to worry about being swindled by scammers who hide behind law firms to try to avoid the MARS Rule,” says Bondi.

“We are taking on schemes that prey on consumers who are struggling to pay their mortgages or facing foreclosure,” adds CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “These companies pocketed illegal fees – taking millions of hard-earned dollars from distressed consumers, and then left those consumers worse off than they began. These practices are not only illegal, they are reprehensible.”

Mass joinder scams

Mass joinder scams, such as the one alleged in this lawsuit, are essentially foreclosure rescue scams, Bondi’s office says in a release. Telemarketers tell homeowners that if they join in a lawsuit with multiple plaintiffs, lenders will be induced to pay large cash payments and provide extensive mortgage relief to each homeowner to settle the case.

Mass joinder scams often claim to have an attorney on staff to represent each homeowner; but, in truth, that attorney is likely not reviewing the facts of each homeowner’s claim, is not directly handling the litigation that may be filed, and often is not even licensed to practice in the homeowner’s state.

HLG and its entities are also facing charges of unfair and deceptive trade practices and civil theft. Bondi and CFPB obtained an emergency court order on July 16 appointing a receiver to control HLG and related entities.

To access the receiver’s website, visit Bernet-Receiver.com.

Other lawsuits filed by CFPB include:

• Clausen & Cobb Management Company and owners Alfred Clausen and Joshua Cobb, as well as Stephen Siringoringo and his Siringoringo Law Firm. The Bureau filed its complaint against three individuals for allegedly charging homeowners illegal advance fees for mortgage loan modifications. Their operation charged initial fees ranging from $1,995 to $3,500, in addition to monthly fees of $495, to thousands of California homeowners in distress.

• The Mortgage Law Group, LLP, the Consumer First Legal Group, LLC, and attorneys Thomas Macey, Jeffrey Aleman, Jason Searns, and Harold Stafford. The CFPB alleges that the firm took in over $19.2 million in fees from over 10,000 distressed homeowners nationwide, with most, if not all, of that money coming from illegal advance fees for so-called loan modification services. Both TMLG and CFLG have ceased operations, but the CFPB is seeking redress for consumers harmed by their practices and permanent injunctive relief against the principals

© 2014 Florida Realtors®

5 Mistakes First-Time Homebuyers Make

NEW YORK – July 22, 2014 – Real estate experts say they see first-time buyers committing the same mistakes, time and time again. Here are some of the most common ones, as identified by experts in a recent CNBC article:

1. They’re unprepared to compete against all-cash offers. Buyers need to be ready to make a quick decision if their housing market is heating up.

Buying a home is “really like finding a job – it’s going to take a lot of time to prepare,” says Cara Pierce, a certified housing counselor with ClearPoint Credit Counseling Solutions. “That way, when the deal comes along, you’re ready to pounce on it.”

Housing experts say buyers should have already saved as much as possible for a downpayment, repaired any credit report blemishes, and get preapproved for a loan as they start their house hunt to put them in a better position to compete.

2. They place a car ahead of the home. Lenders are going to scrutinize applicants’ debt-to-income ratio when assessing how well they can afford a mortgage payment. Consumers’ debt has gone, on average, from $40,000 in 2010 to $51,000 today, according to David Norris, president and COO of loanDepot, a non-bank mortgage lender.

“It would be much easier to own a home if you can show a history of saving and not have gotten yourself into too much debt,” Norris told CNBC.

3. They place too much emphasis on online loan information. Online sites can be good for finding out general information about loan products and estimated costs, but experts recommend visiting mortgage lenders face-to-face to help demystify the process and get advice about the buyer’s specific situation.

“Go to different places and talk to loan officers to get a feel for what the differences are between similar types of loans,” says Pierce. “Sometimes a company won’t charge an origination fee, but then the interest rate is higher … and in some cases you can put many of the upfront costs – closing costs, title insurance – into the loan, which makes your balance larger.”

4. They rely too much on online home values. Some real estate websites are giving buyers a false sense of home values.

“If a buyer believes that the actual value of the property is $1.1 million [as estimated on an online website that advertises home listings] when it’s really $1.3 million, it’s a real disservice to the client,” says John Barrentine, co-founder and CEO of RED Real Estate Group. “You really should [spend time] with someone who understands the market, someone who’s there day in and day out.”

Homebuyers can get the best feel of the market by working with a real estate agent and driving around neighborhoods, so they can get a sense about homes that may be less valuable or even more valuable than suggested online.

5. They forgo the home inspection. About 10 percent of homes recently purchased weren’t inspected by a home inspector, according to Bill Loden, president of the American Society of Home Inspectors. Some buyers were trying to cut down on the costs of hiring an inspector to investigate a home – which usually averages about $450 – but defects uncovered later could potentially result in the loss of thousands of dollars.

“It takes a trained eye to be able to see the problems that can exist in a home,” Loden says. “The inspection can also give the first-time buyer a bit of a schooling on the house and how to maintain it.”

Buyers should also be prepared to ask questions about conditions that are common to specific areas, such as radon in Midwest; sewers in California; and active clay soils in Dallas that can lead to foundation issues. The home may require additional inspection from a specialist to rule out potential problems.

Source: “8 Biggest Mistakes First-Time Homebuyers Make,” CNBC (July 17, 2014)

Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 amending BW-12 is signed into law!

Monday, April 07, 2014 by Chris Black

Late last month, President Obama signed the Homeowner Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 (HR3370).  This bill modifies and/or repeals many of the provisions that were implemented as a result of the passage of the Bigger-Waters Flood Insurance Act of 2012 (BW-12).  The passage of HR3370 comes as a welcomed relief to many realtors in and around our area because BW-12 threatened to severely devalue real estate and ultimately hinder the ability of families to sale their homes.  BW-12 contained several unintended consequences for flood policy holders.  Pinellas was the #1 most affected county in the United States with over 40,000 structures primed to see a rate increase.  Some of these rate changes as a result of BW-12 were very steep and HR3370 will give some relief to many of the family’s that faced skyrocketing premiums.

The #1 thing that we must understand about the new law is that although it was signed by President Obama and it technically is the new law, FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) governs what happens with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).  FEMA has to issue “guidance” on the new law which basically means they’re in charge of deciding when the changes in the new law will take effect.  As of now, FEMA has not issued any guidance and it’s debatable as to when they’ll offer that.  In the case of BW-12, it took FEMA 9 months to issue their guidance on when those changes would be phased in, so buckle up…because it could be a while before we find out when the changes in HR3370 will go into effect!

Here’s a synopsis of HR3370 and how it changes the provisions in BW-12.

TOPICSubsidized Rates for Pre-FIRM (FIRM=Flood Insurance Rate Map) Homes which are homes built prior to the first FIRM in 1974. 

BW-12’s Stance: Basically, this law restricted the use of the subsidized rates for Pre-FIRM homes and mandated that any policy purchased on or after 7/6/12 for Pre-FIRM structures would have to obtain an Elevation Certificate (EC) and pay the “full risk rate” from the onset.  Subsequently, if a homeowner lapsed a subsidized rate policy, they too would be required to obtain an EC and pay the “full risk rate”.  Additionally, all existing Pre-Firm subsidized rate policyholders would begin to see annual increases in their policy to the tune of 25% until their policy reached the “full risk rate”.

HR3370’s Amendments: Subsidized rate structures for Pre-FIRM primary homes have been reinstated with no 25% mandatory rate increases for primary homes.  If a policyholder with a subsidized rate policy decides to lapse the policy, or the lender which was paying the premium for such a policy doesn’t pay the premium and the policy lapses, then the customer may not be eligible for a subsidized rate policy again and may be required to obtain an EC and pay the full risk rate.  The 25% annual increase for non-primary and non-residential homes remains in place. **There are several variables that could occur with this portion of the bill and specific guidance from FEMA is still forthcoming to clean some of the speculation up**

 

TOPIC:  Grandfathering of policies when flood zones change due to FEMA Flood Map Amendments or base flood elevation changes.

BW-12’s Stance:  Eliminated grandfathering of policies all together. 

HR3370’s Amendments: Grandfathering was reinstated on the model prior to BW-12

 

TOPICAnnual Rate Increases

BW-12’s Stance: Prior to this legislation the statutory cap on flood policies was 10%.  BW-12 changed the ceiling on rate increases to 20% annually.

HR3370’s Amendments:  This change is slightly confusion but the amendment now basically states that the rate increases will be between 15-18% and capped at that 18% level.

 

TOPIC:  Preferred Risk Policy (PRP) Eligibillity Extension (PRPEE)

BW-12 & HR3370:  Both laws keep the exiting language in place.  The PRP policy is designed for a home that’s located in a non-mandatory “lower risk” structure located in a B,C, or X flood plain.  In 2010 FEMA allowed for policy holders that were mapped out of this zone to keep their preferred rate policy if it meets a certain set of criteria.  These provisions will be left alone and will not be changed in either law.

 

TOPICAnnual Premium Surcharges

BW-12’s Stance: This topic was not contained in BW-12 and is new to HR3370.  Please note that this “surcharge” is different than the above mentioned Annual Rate Increases

HR3370 Amendments: $25 surcharge will be applied to all primary residential policies and $250 applied to all non-residential and non-primary residential policies.

 

TOPIC: Installment Premium Payments

BW-12’s Stance: Installment payments were authorized but no specifics were provided “guidance” on.

HR3370 Amendments: Monthly Installment payments are specifically mentioned.

TOPIC: Deductibles

BW-12’s Stance: Deductibles for Pre-FIRM structures with building coverage over $100,000 was changed from $1,500 to $2,000.  For Post-FIRM risk the deductibles were changed from $1,000 to $1,250

HR3370 Amendments: BW-12 amendments remain however a deductible of $10,000 must be offered for residential properties.

 

TOPIC: Detached Structures  **Note-Except for limited coverage for a detached garage, there is no “other structures” coverage in the NFIP, and each building requires a separate policy.

BW-12’s Stance: No Changes were made.

HR3370 Amendments: States that all detached structures are NOT required to carry flood insurance.  The bill goes on to state that the requirement to carry the coverage on a “detached structure” may be imposed by a lender to protect their collateral.  **Very ambiguous wording So we’ll see how this provision plays out in the future!**

 

TOPIC: Multi-Family Residential Properties

BW-12’s Stance: Increased the maximum limit of coverage for 5 or more family residential structures from $250,000 per unit to $500,000 per unit.  Effective date for this implementation is set for 6/1/14

HR3370 Amendments: None.

TOPIC: Private Flood Insurance

BW-12’s Stance: Required lenders to accept private flood insurance as satisfaction of flood coverage provided the coverage in the private market met certain requirements, most notably that the policy be “at least as good as the NFIP policy”.

HR3370 Amendments: None.  **Insurers likely will continue to be reluctant to accept coverage from private insurers.**

There are a handful of other topics discussed in the new legislation however they’re not as noteworthy.  It’s important to remember that the FEMA has not issued any “guidance” on the new legislation and all the HR3370 Amendments listed above will not go into effect until that happens. If you have any questions about the affects of the legislation and would like an update on when the HR3370 amendments go into effect please feel free to reach out to our agency and we’ll be glad to assist.

FAA Subpoenas Real Estate Firms That Use Drones

NEW YORK CITY – July 2, 2014 – The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has the real estate industry in its crosshairs, as it begins to come down on the growing popularity of unlawful drone use for taking listing photos and videos.

The FAA has already targeted several brokerages in New York City that use drones, slapping them with subpoenas in a widespread move to learn more about how real estate professionals use the technology to advance their businesses.

This is the FAA’s interpretation of lawful model aircraft use.

The FAA does not condone the use of drones for commercial purposes but is expected to reveal proposed rules for such use next year. For now, practitioners who use drones for their business can be fined – and that’s exactly what will happen to a handful of NYC’s largest brokerages if they don’t stop their drone use immediately, FAA sources told the New York Post.

“It has completely blown up. We’re getting [subpoenas] all over the city and the Hamptons, and they’re just going to general counsel,” a source with New York-based Halstead Property told the Post. “It was a total shock.”

Several other NYC real estate firms have been subpoenaed as well, including Time Equities and Alchemy Property.

“We have a mandate to protect the American public in the air and on the ground, and the public expects us to carry out the mission,” FAA administrator Michael Huerta wrote in a memo, according to the Post.

It speaks to the risk real estate professionals take when using drones for their listings. The National Association of Realtors® has long warned that practitioners should steer clear of using drones for their business until the FAA releases solid rules on such use, which is expected by September 2015.

Source: “FAA takes on city Realtors using drones,” New York Post (July 1, 2014)

© Copyright 2014 INFORMATION, INC. Bethesda, MD (301) 215-4688